|
Post by homefield on Nov 9, 2017 18:53:08 GMT -5
WEEK 9 RESULTS
TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect 122 Brady's Ball Washer 81
Gronkey Kong 95 victorious secret 90
5 Rings 1 Brady 121 Brick Squad 108
Home Field 130 It's a croc of 83
Roger that !!! (2) 91 Vegas Raiders 64
Gronk-Ness Monsters 86 She Gives Woodhead 123
----------------------------------------- WEEK 10 SCHEDULE
Brady's Ball Washer (4-5) Gronkey Kong (7-2)
victorious secret (5-4) 5 Rings 1 Brady (5-4)
Brick Squad (5-4) Home Field (5-4)
It's a croc of (3-6) Roger that !!! (2) (5-4)
Vegas Raiders (6-3) Gronk-Ness Monsters (2-7)
She Gives Woodhead (5-4) TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect (2-7)
|
|
|
Post by homefield on Nov 14, 2017 23:42:35 GMT -5
WEEK 10 RESULTS
Brady's Ball Washer 133 Gronkey Kong 144
victorious secret 99 5 Rings 1 Brady 107
Brick Squad 78 Home Field 80
It's a croc of 118 Roger that !!! (2) 110
Vegas Raiders 93 Gronk-Ness Monsters 95
She Gives Woodhead 135 TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect 63
---------------------------------- WEEK 11 SCHEDULE
5 Rings 1 Brady (6-4) Brady's Ball Washer (4-6)
Home Field (6-4) victorious secret (5-5)
Roger that !!! (2) (5-5) Brick Squad (5-5)
Gronk-Ness Monsters (3-7) It's a croc of (4-6)
TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect (2-8) Vegas Raiders (6-4)
Gronkey Kong (8-2) She Gives Woodhead (6-4)
|
|
|
Post by croc on Nov 21, 2017 15:38:41 GMT -5
WEEK 10 RESULTSBrady's Ball Washer 133 Gronkey Kong 144 victorious secret 99 5 Rings 1 Brady 107 Brick Squad 78 Home Field 80 It's a croc of 118 Roger that !!! (2) 110 Vegas Raiders 93 Gronk-Ness Monsters 95 She Gives Woodhead 135 TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect 63 ---------------------------------- WEEK 11 SCHEDULE 5 Rings 1 Brady (6-4) Brady's Ball Washer (4-6) Home Field (6-4) victorious secret (5-5) Roger that !!! (2) (5-5) Brick Squad (5-5) Gronk-Ness Monsters (3-7) It's a croc of (4-6) TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect (2-8) Vegas Raiders (6-4) Gronkey Kong (8-2) She Gives Woodhead (6-4) I love Gronk-Ness' flying snowman avatar at the Fantasy site
|
|
|
Post by homefield on Nov 22, 2017 20:25:20 GMT -5
WEEK 11 RESULTS
5 Rings 1 Brady 96 Brady's Ball Washer 114
Home Field 78 victorious secret 90
Roger that !!! (2) 117 Brick Squad 102
Gronk-Ness Monsters 102 It's a croc of 126
TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect 117 Vegas Raiders 108
Gronkey Kong 118 She Gives Woodhead 135
-------------------------------------- WEEK 12 SCHEDULE
Home Field (6-5) Brady's Ball Washer (5-6)
Roger that !!! (2) (6-5) victorious secret (6-5)
Gronk-Ness Monsters (3-8) Brick Squad (5-6)
TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect (3-8) It's a croc of (5-6)
Gronkey Kong (8-3) Vegas Raiders (6-5)
5 Rings 1 Brady (6-5) She Gives Woodhead (7-4)
|
|
|
Post by wonderdrums on Nov 30, 2017 21:31:44 GMT -5
How do you guys feel about an IR spot on the roster next season? I have David Johnson sitting on my bench all season because it’s a keeper league and I don’t want to drop him. It would however, be nice to have a roster spot available to pick up a useful player for bye weeks and such. I know I’m not alone in this situation. What do we think?
|
|
|
Post by jri37 on Nov 30, 2017 21:54:59 GMT -5
How do you guys feel about an IR spot on the roster next season? I have David Johnson sitting on my bench all season because it’s a keeper league and I don’t want to drop him. It would however, be nice to have a roster spot available to pick up a useful player for bye weeks and such. I know I’m not alone in this situation. What do we think? I'm in another keeper league and we have an IR spot. It's worked out well for me as I have Dalvin Cook. We are actually thinking of having 2 IR spots with so many guys going down. I'm good with doing that if the rest of the league wants to.
|
|
|
Post by thejuice on Dec 2, 2017 13:00:00 GMT -5
How do you guys feel about an IR spot on the roster next season? I have David Johnson sitting on my bench all season because it’s a keeper league and I don’t want to drop him. It would however, be nice to have a roster spot available to pick up a useful player for bye weeks and such. I know I’m not alone in this situation. What do we think? I'm in another keeper league and we have an IR spot. It's worked out well for me as I have Dalvin Cook. We are actually thinking of having 2 IR spots with so many guys going down. I'm good with doing that if the rest of the league wants to. I dont know if I'm For an IR spot but I'm definitely not against it. But if say if we do 1 spot, it's only 1 spot.
|
|
|
Post by jri37 on Dec 2, 2017 13:12:30 GMT -5
I'm in another keeper league and we have an IR spot. It's worked out well for me as I have Dalvin Cook. We are actually thinking of having 2 IR spots with so many guys going down. I'm good with doing that if the rest of the league wants to. I dont know if I'm For an IR spot but I'm definitely not against it. But if say if we do 1 spot, it's only 1 spot. It can be 1 or whatever the league decides. In the league I'm in it's a keeper league and we we use 1 spot. right now 8 of the 12 teams are using that spot so they don't have to drop a guy like Beckhan, Rogers, Dalvin Cook etc... so they can consider them for a keeper the following year.
|
|
|
Post by NEGAME on Dec 2, 2017 15:48:41 GMT -5
I dont know if I'm For an IR spot but I'm definitely not against it. But if say if we do 1 spot, it's only 1 spot. It can be 1 or whatever the league decides. In the league I'm in it's a keeper league and we we use 1 spot. right now 8 of the 12 teams are using that spot so they don't have to drop a guy like Beckhan, Rogers, Dalvin Cook etc... so they can consider them for a keeper the following year. I don't mean to be rude, but come on. Those are the breaks, too bad. Those are the tough decisions you have to make. I'm against it.
|
|
|
Post by jri37 on Dec 2, 2017 15:55:40 GMT -5
It can be 1 or whatever the league decides. In the league I'm in it's a keeper league and we we use 1 spot. right now 8 of the 12 teams are using that spot so they don't have to drop a guy like Beckhan, Rogers, Dalvin Cook etc... so they can consider them for a keeper the following year. I don't mean to be rude, but come on. Those are the breaks, too bad. Those are the tough decisions you have to make. I'm against it. I would agree in a non keeper league but why not have an IR spot in a keeper league? Seems like a good thing for everyone especially if one of your stars gets hurt. That being said it doesn't matter to me one way or another, whatever is decided the rule applies to all.
|
|
|
Post by NEGAME on Dec 2, 2017 16:11:14 GMT -5
That's ok you guys decide. I've pretty much decided I'm not going to be in this league next year.
|
|
|
Post by NEGAME on Dec 2, 2017 16:27:55 GMT -5
I don't mean to be rude, but come on. Those are the breaks, too bad. Those are the tough decisions you have to make. I'm against it. I would agree in a non keeper league but why not have an IR spot in a keeper league? Seems like a good thing for everyone especially if one of your stars gets hurt. That being said it doesn't matter to me one way or another, whatever is decided the rule applies to all. LOL I don't have any stars.
|
|
|
Post by thejuice on Dec 2, 2017 19:35:48 GMT -5
It can be 1 or whatever the league decides. In the league I'm in it's a keeper league and we we use 1 spot. right now 8 of the 12 teams are using that spot so they don't have to drop a guy like Beckhan, Rogers, Dalvin Cook etc... so they can consider them for a keeper the following year. I don't mean to be rude, but come on. Those are the breaks, too bad. Those are the tough decisions you have to make. I'm against it. Now that I think about it, I'm with u game. No to an IR spot. 3 keepers and no IR spot is the way it should stay
|
|
|
Post by homefield on Dec 4, 2017 17:14:46 GMT -5
WEEK 12 RESULTS
Home Field 121 Brady's Ball Washer 95
Roger that !!! (2) 121 victorious secret 76
Gronk-Ness Monsters 86 Brick Squad 146
TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect 92 It's a croc of 91
Gronkey Kong 118 Vegas Raiders 116
5 Rings 1 Brady 95 She Gives Woodhead 155
------------------------------------------- WEEK 13 SCHEDULE
Brady's Ball Washer (5-7) Roger that !!! (2) (7-5)
victorious secret (6-6) Gronk-Ness Monsters (3-9)
Brick Squad (6-6) TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect (4-8)
It's a croc of (5-7) Gronkey Kong (9-3)
Vegas Raiders (6-6) 5 Rings 1 Brady (6-6)
She Gives Woodhead (8-4) Home Field (7-5)
|
|
|
Post by homefield on Dec 4, 2017 17:27:12 GMT -5
How do you guys feel about an IR spot on the roster next season? I have David Johnson sitting on my bench all season because it’s a keeper league and I don’t want to drop him. It would however, be nice to have a roster spot available to pick up a useful player for bye weeks and such. I know I’m not alone in this situation. What do we think? I'm good with whatever the league votes on. I'm going to set up some polls on the league website (main page)
|
|
|
Post by homefield on Dec 4, 2017 17:48:45 GMT -5
I created 3 polls on the league website
1. stay at espn or move to yahoo 2. Draft Order 3. IR spot
Please vote!
|
|
|
Post by homefield on Dec 4, 2017 17:54:48 GMT -5
I would agree in a non keeper league but why not have an IR spot in a keeper league? Seems like a good thing for everyone especially if one of your stars gets hurt. That being said it doesn't matter to me one way or another, whatever is decided the rule applies to all. LOL I don't have any stars. I think a lot of issues could be resolved if we just switched the rules and allowed people to keep only 2 keepers if they prefer and could enter the draft a round early. That would create lots of parity as far as keepers go. I brought it up a few times but haven't received much feedback about it
|
|
|
Post by jri37 on Dec 4, 2017 18:06:43 GMT -5
I created 3 polls on the league website 1. stay at espn or move to yahoo 2. Draft Order 3. IR spot Please vote! Voted and will be good with whatever is decided.
|
|
|
Post by wonderdrums on Dec 4, 2017 22:42:10 GMT -5
I don't mean to be rude, but come on. Those are the breaks, too bad. Those are the tough decisions you have to make. I'm against it. I would agree in a non keeper league but why not have an IR spot in a keeper league? Seems like a good thing for everyone especially if one of your stars gets hurt. That being said it doesn't matter to me one way or another, whatever is decided the rule applies to all. That was my thought in proposing the question jri. I’m cool with the league either way too. If any manager is opposed to it at all I say don’t do it. This is for fun and I certainly don’t want to see any of you guys leave the league over a non issue like this. I don’t have a lot of keeper league experience but I know I’m handcuffed a roster spot because of an injury and that others are too. It just seemed like the obvious question to ask. Sorry to stir the pot.
|
|
|
Post by thejuice on Dec 5, 2017 13:49:48 GMT -5
I would agree in a non keeper league but why not have an IR spot in a keeper league? Seems like a good thing for everyone especially if one of your stars gets hurt. That being said it doesn't matter to me one way or another, whatever is decided the rule applies to all. That was my thought in proposing the question jri. I’m cool with the league either way too. If any manager is opposed to it at all I say don’t do it. This is for fun and I certainly don’t want to see any of you guys leave the league over a non issue like this. I don’t have a lot of keeper league experience but I know I’m handcuffed a roster spot because of an injury and that others are too. It just seemed like the obvious question to ask. Sorry to stir the pot. I agree. No in season ir spot
|
|
|
Post by thejuice on Dec 5, 2017 13:50:09 GMT -5
LOL I don't have any stars. I think a lot of issues could be resolved if we just switched the rules and allowed people to keep only 2 keepers if they prefer and could enter the draft a round early. That would create lots of parity as far as keepers go. I brought it up a few times but haven't received much feedback about it I like this idea
|
|
|
Post by NEGAME on Dec 5, 2017 21:16:44 GMT -5
guess our playoffs start next week ? Don't think I can squeak in.
|
|
|
Post by thejuice on Dec 6, 2017 12:17:41 GMT -5
guess our playoffs start next week ? Don't think I can squeak in. No they start this week, week 14
|
|
|
Post by homefield on Dec 6, 2017 13:31:04 GMT -5
WEEK 13 RESULTS
Brady's Ball Washer 107 Roger that !!! (2) 130
victorious secret 119 Gronk-Ness Monsters 91
Brick Squad 95 TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect 78
It's a croc of 102 Gronkey Kong 109
Vegas Raiders 142 5 Rings 1 Brady 114
She Gives Woodhead 141 Home Field 97
-------------------------------------------------------- ROUND 1 - PLAYOFFS SCHEDULE
Bye weeks: #1 Gronkey Kong, #2 She Gives Woodhead
#5 Vegas Raiders (7-6) #4 Brick Squad (7-6)
#6 Home Field (7-6) #3 Roger that !!! (2) (8-5)
-----------------------------
#8 5 Rings 1 Brady (6-7) #7 victorious secret (7-6)
#10 It's a croc of (5-8) #9 Brady's Ball Washer (5-8)
#12 Gronk-Ness Monsters (3-10) #11 TheGoat's Balls Are Perfect (4-9)
|
|
|
Post by thejuice on Dec 6, 2017 21:37:47 GMT -5
In the consolation bracket, shouldn't 7 play 12, 11 play 8 and 9 play 10?
|
|