|
|
Post by freediro on Mar 27, 2024 10:03:39 GMT -5
I know this isn’t a very popular option, but we truly have zero receiving threats. If the Pats don’t love any of the early QBs, why not trade back a bit and get a stud young WR? Hopefully get an additional 1st round pick for O-line then draft a QB in the 2nd round or later.
If we do go WR at #3 or in the 1st as our first pick of the draft, I personally am a HUGE fan of Nabers. Odunze also has some very impressive tape and advanced stats from college.
I wouldn’t totally hate not getting a QB first overall, but it would have to be in a way to ensure we “weaponize” the offense, lol
|
|
|
|
Post by wonderdrums on Mar 27, 2024 10:07:45 GMT -5
I like all of your choices but if they pass on a QB, Joe Alt would be my selection in the first if they can make it happen. There are a lot of good receivers to be had on the first three rounds this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wozzy on Mar 27, 2024 10:08:26 GMT -5
The entire front office should be fired immediately.
|
|
|
|
Post by muzwell on Mar 27, 2024 10:10:34 GMT -5
My poll would be if we take a WR at 3, how do you want it to end?
38 to the temple
Train
Hanging
Harakiri
Cyanide capsule
Death by cop
|
|
|
|
Post by wazzu on Mar 27, 2024 10:23:38 GMT -5
The entire front office should be fired immediately. Absolutely |
|
|
|
Post by wazzu on Mar 27, 2024 10:24:18 GMT -5
My poll would be if we take a WR at 3, how do you want it to end? 38 to the temple Train Hanging Harakiri Cyanide capsule Death by cop Wow. The last one made me spit out my coffee. |
|
|
|
Post by rkarp on Mar 27, 2024 11:16:02 GMT -5
The entire front office should be fired immediately. we agree on something! bravo. |
|
|
|
Post by freediro on Mar 27, 2024 11:27:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by thejuice on Mar 27, 2024 11:38:01 GMT -5
The entire front office should be fired immediately. 10000% agree. Look we need WRs on this roster but at 3? No way. Don’t even want one in the first rd unless it’s late and we’ve already made one pick earlier in rd 1 that was hopefully a QB or if not an LT |
|
|
|
Post by mbeaulieu07 on Mar 27, 2024 11:45:54 GMT -5
I've long been a Nabers guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by rkarp on Mar 27, 2024 12:03:28 GMT -5
I've long been a Nabers guy. he was great in Gomer Pyle |
|
|
|
Post by Brady2Welker47 on Mar 27, 2024 12:05:13 GMT -5
If Pats pass on a QB at #3 overall, the best available player is MHJ. There should be no question.
|
|
|
|
Post by rkarp on Mar 27, 2024 12:09:22 GMT -5
If Pats pass on a QB at #3 overall, the best available player is MHJ. There should be no question. I think there is significant question, given how hard it is to find a quality LT versus WR. MHJ perhaps is the best player available in the entire draft, but the team needs a LT and if they pass on a QB at #3, and do not trade back, they should select the player they like best to play LT at #3. need to plug some significant holes, not select BPA |
|
|
|
Post by Brady2Welker47 on Mar 27, 2024 12:18:52 GMT -5
If Pats pass on a QB at #3 overall, the best available player is MHJ. There should be no question. I think there is significant question, given how hard it is to find a quality LT versus WR. MHJ perhaps is the best player available in the entire draft, but the team needs a LT and if they pass on a QB at #3, and do not trade back, they should select the player they like best to play LT at #3. need to plug some significant holes, not select BPA I agree with you on the importance of Tackle ...but this draft is deep at tackle. MHJ appears to be a generational type. Provided Pats pass on QB ...I would want MHJ |
|
|
|
Post by michiganadam on Mar 27, 2024 12:42:39 GMT -5
I think there is significant question, given how hard it is to find a quality LT versus WR. MHJ perhaps is the best player available in the entire draft, but the team needs a LT and if they pass on a QB at #3, and do not trade back, they should select the player they like best to play LT at #3. need to plug some significant holes, not select BPA I agree with you on the importance of Tackle ...but this draft is deep at tackle. MHJ appears to be a generational type. Provided Pats pass on QB ...I would want MHJ This draft is also deep at wr. Wr is at best our 3rd largest need, maybe 4th behind a true 2 way te. Mhj is not a unicorn, just the best of a deep group at a position of moderate need. We litterly do not have an above replacement level LT, which is the second most important position on offense. QB is a bigger need, but a risky pick. If you are very comfortable with your qb choice take him. Otherwise trade back and take lt or te or 2nd tier qb... |
|
|
|
Post by muzwell on Mar 27, 2024 12:42:59 GMT -5
Little known fact, it’s pronounced Nabaas
|
|
|
|
Post by DaPatriots on Mar 27, 2024 12:53:44 GMT -5
Little known fact, it’s pronounced Nabaas Thanks Ahnald! |
|
|
|
Post by thejuice on Mar 27, 2024 13:20:53 GMT -5
I think there is significant question, given how hard it is to find a quality LT versus WR. MHJ perhaps is the best player available in the entire draft, but the team needs a LT and if they pass on a QB at #3, and do not trade back, they should select the player they like best to play LT at #3. need to plug some significant holes, not select BPA I agree with you on the importance of Tackle ...but this draft is deep at tackle. MHJ appears to be a generational type. Provided Pats pass on QB ...I would want MHJ The draft is even deeper at WR |
|
|
|
Post by patriotsnumero1fan on Mar 27, 2024 13:39:26 GMT -5
I've long been a Nabers guy. He’s killing it at lsu pro day right now. |
|
|
|
Post by zenape on Mar 27, 2024 13:50:16 GMT -5
I agree with you on the importance of Tackle ...but this draft is deep at tackle. MHJ appears to be a generational type. Provided Pats pass on QB ...I would want MHJ The draft is even deeper at WR There's 10 OT's with a 6.25 or higher grade on the NFL.com site, and 15 WR's that also attain such a grade. Of those OT's I would say only about 7 will make for good LT's, the rest would be far more comfortable at RT. So if you are picking early and then hoping for the best further down the line, of the two positions OT might be the smarter move. |
|
|
|
Post by section136 on Mar 27, 2024 14:29:24 GMT -5
I think there is significant question, given how hard it is to find a quality LT versus WR. MHJ perhaps is the best player available in the entire draft, but the team needs a LT and if they pass on a QB at #3, and do not trade back, they should select the player they like best to play LT at #3. need to plug some significant holes, not select BPA I agree with you on the importance of Tackle ...but this draft is deep at tackle. MHJ appears to be a generational type. Provided Pats pass on QB ...I would want MHJ It may be deep at tackle but if you take the RT's out of the mix, not so much. It is however very deep at WR. |
|
|
|
Post by seattlepat2016 on Mar 27, 2024 15:24:51 GMT -5
I think there is significant question, given how hard it is to find a quality LT versus WR. MHJ perhaps is the best player available in the entire draft, but the team needs a LT and if they pass on a QB at #3, and do not trade back, they should select the player they like best to play LT at #3. need to plug some significant holes, not select BPA I agree with you on the importance of Tackle ...but this draft is deep at tackle. MHJ appears to be a generational type. Provided Pats pass on QB ...I would want MHJ What does that phrase - generational WR - mean? For us who are not very smart with words, please translate that into per season catches, yards and TDs that can be expected of the WR. |
|
|
|
Post by backbay on Mar 27, 2024 15:49:08 GMT -5
None of above. I'd trade down to #6 and take best OT
|
|
|
|
Post by seattlepat2016 on Mar 27, 2024 15:56:19 GMT -5
I've long been a Nabers guy. His ability to burst into full speed, suddenly stop full, then burst back into full speed again is insane. |
|
|
|
Post by seattlepat2016 on Mar 27, 2024 15:57:32 GMT -5
None of above. I'd trade down to #6 and take best OT If it's not a QB then yes, go Alt. |
|
