|
Post by seattlepat2016 on Oct 24, 2017 23:45:48 GMT -5
I believe more so for the Pats O than the D. LAC's D is ranked 8th on points allowed. They're tied for 4th ins sacks (21), most of it from Bosa (7.5) and Ingram (8.5). It'll be interesting to see how the Pats handles that without the quick pass to JE.
LAC's O is so so. They're averaging 19.6 PPG. I have always thought that Rivers is overrated. He chokes when the score is close late in the game. Gordon might be a bigger challenge to stop. Should be no problem if HT plays. If the D can play as sharp as they did v ATL, they should be fine.
|
|
|
Post by portfolio1 on Oct 24, 2017 23:54:35 GMT -5
The stats imply we "should" try to establish dominance on the ground from the start. I expect Lewis to be the first RB on the field. I expect a little more of Burkhead perhaps. Maybe a little less Gillislee.
One test will be whether we put real stoppers on the Chargers run offense. Putting them in 3rd and long will go a long way to dictating the whole game.
Bottom line is I think whether we play 60 minutes of complementary football. If we run well and are sound in slowing their running game TB will easily take up those moments of slack where he will be needed. This might not end up a high scoring game but we could dominate from start to finish.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2017 0:04:16 GMT -5
Those 2 DEs are definitely going to be game planned for. A lot of chipping from the backs and help from the TEs I would assume. If NE can shut down the run I do not believe Olde man Rivers can win in a shootout anymore. LAC are playing better than ATL so this should be a good game.
|
|
|
Post by mrmojo112058 on Oct 25, 2017 7:54:07 GMT -5
“This is, now, where it really starts to feel more like football season. … The hopes are all probably more tempered with reality. Now you really see what you’re made of.”
— Brady, via Boston radio station WEEI
|
|
|
Post by jri37 on Oct 25, 2017 7:58:17 GMT -5
With a competent kicker the LAC could easily be 5-2. The Chargers have one of the best pass rush and Melvin Gordon is finally living up to billing. This game will be a dog fight.
|
|
|
Post by rkarp on Oct 25, 2017 8:02:13 GMT -5
With a competent kicker the LAC could easily be 5-2. The Chargers have one of the best pass rush and Melvin Gordon is finally living up to billing. This game will be a dog fight. every game is a dog fight. especially when teams play the Pats. for the most part, no team looks past the Pats. most teams look at the Pats game as their toughest test of the year.
|
|
|
Post by NEGAME on Oct 25, 2017 8:35:03 GMT -5
I'm not that impressed with the Chargers. They beat the Giants, Raiders and Broncos. Big deal. Rivers is a gun slinger, has that weird side throwing motion, which can be blocked, He's reckless. His greatest asset is his big mouth. Yes Bosa and Ingram are good, it's on the O-line to take care of them.
Patriots-31
Chargers-17
Two defense interceptions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2017 8:42:49 GMT -5
Anybody see the Chargers give up 140 yards a game in rushing which stinks. 31st in the NFL 4.9 attempt. You think this should be a passing game? Let the DE's go after Brady? Get a lead play boring No Turnovers = Win. The passing games are coming, Miami and Buffalo Football Outsiders has them ranked 27th, we're ranked 26. 2 weeks ago we were 32. In rushing Defense. They rank #8 in passing Defense, with Football Outsiders. They give up an avg. 185 yards a game, in passing Defense. Yes Josh fling it.
|
|
|
Post by agcsbill on Oct 25, 2017 8:52:22 GMT -5
The stats imply we "should" try to establish dominance on the ground from the start. I expect Lewis to be the first RB on the field. I expect a little more of Burkhead perhaps. Maybe a little less Gillislee. One test will be whether we put real stoppers on the Chargers run offense. Putting them in 3rd and long will go a long way to dictating the whole game. Bottom line is I think whether we play 60 minutes of complementary football. If we run well and are sound in slowing their running game TB will easily take up those moments of slack where he will be needed. This might not end up a high scoring game but we could dominate from start to finish. The "stats" prior to the Falcons' game implied the Pats would be blown out by the Falcons. Many here called for the Pats to lose and the Falcons would score upwards of 30+ points. So much for stats. Also, do we trust that 3 games winning streak of the Chargers considering who they played? Giants, Raiders with an somewhat injured Carr and the slumping Broncos.
|
|
|
Post by texaspat on Oct 25, 2017 9:11:43 GMT -5
I believe more so for the Pats O than the D. LAC's D is ranked 8th on points allowed. They're tied for 4th ins sacks (21), most of it from Bosa (7.5) and Ingram (8.5). It'll be interesting to see how the Pats handles that without the quick pass to JE. LAC's O is so so. They're averaging 19.6 PPG. I have always thought that Rivers is overrated. He chokes when the score is close late in the game. Gordon might be a bigger challenge to stop. Should be no problem if HT plays. If the D can play as sharp as they did v ATL, they should be fine. Agreed. The Bolts have a solid young defense, with edge players like Bosa and Ingram who can get after the GOAT. The OL needs to be at it's best in this one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2017 9:13:04 GMT -5
We lose this game I'll be shocked, West Coast to East Coast, in our house. Actually I could see a potential blowout. They play like last week forget it. They revert then its a game.
Get balance, play-action, no turnovers. Only time you worry about the DE is long yardage situations. Play boring. Patience, play field position game.
Funny after game all the talk shows up here, the former players, Mayo, Brown, Koppen, all said the Pats are almost unbeatable in Play-Action passing. Unfortunately you have to run for this to work. Yards is not important its attempting you want to establish the run, that sets up a Defense.
|
|
|
Post by portfolio1 on Oct 25, 2017 9:17:13 GMT -5
The stats imply we "should" try to establish dominance on the ground from the start. I expect Lewis to be the first RB on the field. I expect a little more of Burkhead perhaps. Maybe a little less Gillislee. One test will be whether we put real stoppers on the Chargers run offense. Putting them in 3rd and long will go a long way to dictating the whole game. Bottom line is I think whether we play 60 minutes of complementary football. If we run well and are sound in slowing their running game TB will easily take up those moments of slack where he will be needed. This might not end up a high scoring game but we could dominate from start to finish. The "stats" prior to the Falcons' game implied the Pats would be blown out by the Falcons. Many here called for the Pats to lose and the Falcons would score upwards of 30+ points. So much for stats. Also, do we trust that 3 games winning streak of the Chargers considering who they played? Giants, Raiders with an somewhat injured Carr and the slumping Broncos. My point wasnt to predict a degree of success or failure based on stats. My point was simply that they indicate that it is far easier to run against them than pass. So it is an opportune time to push the run. If and when the Charges change packages to better defend the run then TB can do what he does best.
|
|
|
Post by rkarp on Oct 25, 2017 9:27:32 GMT -5
I think the Pats can run against this team. Andrews, Shaq and Cannon coming off very good game can continue to exploit the Chargers aggressive rush. Some screen passes and draw plays should also be an early part of the game plan. Was not impressed with the Chargers LB's (disclaimer: have only seen the Chargers play 1 time this season)
I would like to see both Hogan and Dorsett more decoy a S deep this game, with Cooks and Danny and Gronk working short routes, pooch screens and slants. Would also think Lewis, Burkhead and White could combine for 15 plus rcpts
I would also expect more bend but do not break. Give Rivers 300 plus yards, but turn him over 2 to 3 times.
|
|
|
Post by pumpsiegreen on Oct 25, 2017 9:38:22 GMT -5
I'm not that impressed with the Chargers. They beat the Giants, Raiders and Broncos. Big deal. Rivers is a gun slinger, has that weird side throwing motion, which can be blocked, He's reckless. His greatest asset is his big mouth. Yes Bosa and Ingram are good, it's on the O-line to take care of them. Patriots-31 Chargers-17 Two defense interceptions. Solder either is injured or he just sucks. He isn't going to be able to handle good pass rushers. The rest of the O line I am not worried about.
|
|
|
Post by agcsbill on Oct 25, 2017 10:06:28 GMT -5
The "stats" prior to the Falcons' game implied the Pats would be blown out by the Falcons. Many here called for the Pats to lose and the Falcons would score upwards of 30+ points. So much for stats. Also, do we trust that 3 games winning streak of the Chargers considering who they played? Giants, Raiders with an somewhat injured Carr and the slumping Broncos. My point wasnt to predict a degree of success or failure based on stats. My point was simply that they indicate that it is far easier to run against them than pass. So it is an opportune time to push the run. If and when the Charges change packages to better defend the run then TB can do what he does best. I see that..... But, we never know what game plan BB and JM will trot out Sunday, will we?
|
|
|
Post by texaspat on Oct 25, 2017 10:13:41 GMT -5
We lose this game I'll be shocked, West Coast to East Coast, in our house. Actually I could see a potential blowout. They play like last week forget it. They revert then its a game. Get balance, play-action, no turnovers. Only time you worry about the DE is long yardage situations. Play boring. Patience, play field position game. Funny after game all the talk shows up here, the former players, Mayo, Brown, Koppen, all said the Pats are almost unbeatable in Play-Action passing. Unfortunately you have to run for this to work. Yards is not important its attempting you want to establish the run, that sets up a Defense. Losing this game would certainly be a major disappointment, after the Pats jut turned in their best performance of the years against Atlanta. I'm not saying that the Pats are going to lose...just that this game has the potential to be a tougher one than expected.
On the other hand, if the Patriots turn in another very good performance next week, Pats' fans will be justified in being optimistic for the remainder of the season.
But, as always, staying relatively injury free is the key. Look at what happened in Philly. They're flying high at 6-1, and then their starting LT, pro-bowler Jason Peters, tears up his knee and is done for the season. Things can change in a hurry in pro football.
|
|
|
Post by NEGAME on Oct 25, 2017 10:21:24 GMT -5
I'm not that impressed with the Chargers. They beat the Giants, Raiders and Broncos. Big deal. Rivers is a gun slinger, has that weird side throwing motion, which can be blocked, He's reckless. His greatest asset is his big mouth. Yes Bosa and Ingram are good, it's on the O-line to take care of them. Patriots-31 Chargers-17 Two defense interceptions. Solder either is injured or he just sucks. He isn't going to be able to handle good pass rushers. The rest of the O line I am not worried about. Nate Solder's infant son is suffering from a rare form of kidney cancer. He starts chemotherapy soon. Poor little boy. Maybe he has more on his mind than fking football.
|
|
|
Post by rkarp on Oct 25, 2017 10:24:28 GMT -5
Solder either is injured or he just sucks. He isn't going to be able to handle good pass rushers. The rest of the O line I am not worried about. Nate Solder's infant son is suffering from a rare form of kidney cancer. He starts chemotherapy soon. Poor little boy. Maybe he has more on his mind than fking football. ^this. I think the criticism of Solder needs to cease. Knowing his situation, we should be applauding him for trying to stay on the field to help his team mates win. perhaps foot ball is therapy for him. a way to get away from his daily worries. if the staff thought better options available, I am sure they would be playing ahead of Solder. they aren't. so case closed.
|
|
|
Post by texaspat on Oct 25, 2017 10:49:30 GMT -5
Solder either is injured or he just sucks. He isn't going to be able to handle good pass rushers. The rest of the O line I am not worried about. Nate Solder's infant son is suffering from a rare form of kidney cancer. He starts chemotherapy soon. Poor little boy. Maybe he has more on his mind than fking football. That sucks! How sad.
|
|
|
Post by pumpsiegreen on Oct 25, 2017 10:55:43 GMT -5
Nate Solder's infant son is suffering from a rare form of kidney cancer. He starts chemotherapy soon. Poor little boy. Maybe he has more on his mind than fking football. ^this. I think the criticism of Solder needs to cease. Knowing his situation, we should be applauding him for trying to stay on the field to help his team mates win. perhaps foot ball is therapy for him. a way to get away from his daily worries. if the staff thought better options available, I am sure they would be playing ahead of Solder. they aren't. so case closed. I am sorry that Solder's son has kidney cancer. Everyone should be. I think he should excuse himself from the team in order to be with his son if his head is not into the game. I wouldn't blame him a bit if he did that. Solder's kid should be his main priority. That said, he ALSO has a responsibility to his team-mates, the owners, and to the fans to do what needs to be done to insure the success of the team. Meanwhile, if he plays, and plays poorly, he should expect criticism.
|
|
|
Post by croc on Oct 25, 2017 11:03:20 GMT -5
Nate Solder's infant son is suffering from a rare form of kidney cancer. He starts chemotherapy soon. Poor little boy. Maybe he has more on his mind than fking football. That sucks! How sad. Bedard has hinted he's banged up too, but any parent would be distracted with that going on. My best wishes to Nate, his son and family.
|
|
|
Post by cyncalpatsfan on Oct 25, 2017 11:14:04 GMT -5
I'm not that impressed with the Chargers. They beat the Giants, Raiders and Broncos. Big deal. Rivers is a gun slinger, has that weird side throwing motion, which can be blocked, He's reckless. His greatest asset is his big mouth. Yes Bosa and Ingram are good, it's on the O-line to take care of them. Patriots-31 Chargers-17 Two defense interceptions. Solder either is injured or he just sucks. He isn't going to be able to handle good pass rushers. The rest of the O line I am not worried about. Or, he has a child receiving cancer treatment.
|
|
|
Post by cyncalpatsfan on Oct 25, 2017 11:27:17 GMT -5
^this. I think the criticism of Solder needs to cease. Knowing his situation, we should be applauding him for trying to stay on the field to help his team mates win. perhaps foot ball is therapy for him. a way to get away from his daily worries. if the staff thought better options available, I am sure they would be playing ahead of Solder. they aren't. so case closed. I am sorry that Solder's son has kidney cancer. Everyone should be. I think he should excuse himself from the team in order to be with his son if his head is not into the game. I wouldn't blame him a bit if he did that. Solder's kid should be his main priority. That said, he ALSO has a responsibility to his team-mates, the owners, and to the fans to do what needs to be done to insure the success of the team. Meanwhile, if he plays, and plays poorly, he should expect criticism. Some things are bigger than the game or the team. I think this is one of them and I bet there isn't one of his teammates who would disagree. If the man is healthy and wants to play then let him play. Remember, this is his job and his way to support his family so that his child (his number one priority) can receive the care that he needs. I'm a Pats fan, but he has no responsibility to me. Personally, I hope they let him continue to go out there and do his job, to the best of his ability...even if it is somewhat compromised, right now.
|
|
|
Post by ATJ on Oct 25, 2017 11:38:51 GMT -5
I am sorry that Solder's son has kidney cancer. Everyone should be. I think he should excuse himself from the team in order to be with his son if his head is not into the game. I wouldn't blame him a bit if he did that. Solder's kid should be his main priority. That said, he ALSO has a responsibility to his team-mates, the owners, and to the fans to do what needs to be done to insure the success of the team. Meanwhile, if he plays, and plays poorly, he should expect criticism. Some things are bigger than the game or the team. I think this is one of them and I bet there isn't one of his teammates who would disagree. If the man is healthy and wants to play then let him play. Remember, this is his job and his way to support his family so that his child (his number one priority) can receive the care that he needs. I'm a Pats fan, but he has no responsibility to me. Personally, I hope they let him continue to go out there and do his job, to the best of his ability...even if it is somewhat compromised, right now. +1 Well said.
|
|
|
Post by muzwell on Oct 25, 2017 11:43:27 GMT -5
I am sorry that Solder's son has kidney cancer. Everyone should be. I think he should excuse himself from the team in order to be with his son if his head is not into the game. I wouldn't blame him a bit if he did that. Solder's kid should be his main priority. That said, he ALSO has a responsibility to his team-mates, the owners, and to the fans to do what needs to be done to insure the success of the team. Meanwhile, if he plays, and plays poorly, he should expect criticism. Some things are bigger than the game or the team. I think this is one of them and I bet there isn't one of his teammates who would disagree. If the man is healthy and wants to play then let him play. Remember, this is his job and his way to support his family so that his child (his number one priority) can receive the care that he needs. I'm a Pats fan, but he has no responsibility to me. Personally, I hope they let him continue to go out there and do his job, to the best of his ability...even if it is somewhat compromised, right now. Yeah, plus although I don't know Solder I can imagine he has a lot of support from his teammates and it's at least a little therapeutic to lose himself in the game he's been playing since he was a kid himself. Been there, done that. I'm sure there are harder things to deal with than a child with life threatening medical issues...I just don't know what that might be. Death, I suppose. Phantom holding calls...not that big of a deal
|
|